Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114016›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

CO

Chen Wang, Siyuan Zhang, Tingting Hua, Jianpeng Zeng, Meijuan Lan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen WangDepartment of Intelligent Architecture, Zhejiang College of Security Technology, Wenzhou, 325016, China.
Siyuan ZhangDepartment of Intelligent Architecture, Zhejiang College of Security Technology, Wenzhou, 325016, China.
Tingting HuaDepartment of Intelligent Architecture, Zhejiang College of Security Technology, Wenzhou, 325016, China.
Jianpeng ZengWenzhou Fire Rescue Detachment, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
Meijuan LanDepartment of Intelligent Architecture, Zhejiang College of Security Technology, Wenzhou, 325016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geological sequestration of carbon dioxide is a critical strategy to combat global warming, playing a significant role in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and preservation of the global ecosystem. Over more than three decades, this domain has expanded to encompass myriad research avenues and nuanced sub-fields. Proficiency in navigating the dynamic developments and prominent challenges in this arena is imperative for promoting scholarly advancement. In this investigation, bibliometric techniques are applied to perform a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative investigation of the progression of studies on CO

Indexed as

BibliometricsCO2 geological storageKnowledge mappingVisualization

Identifiers

PMID39114016
PMCPMC11305291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.