ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison of different doses of Tripterygium glycosides treating in IgA vasculitis nephritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy of Tripterygium Glycosides in the treatment of Chinese patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tripterygium glycosides (TG) is extracted from the roots of Methods: Ten databases were searched from their inception to April 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using TG, TG combined with glucocorticoids (GC), or TG combined with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to treat IgAVN. A network meta-analysis was performed following the protocol (CRD42023401645). Results: Forty-four eligible RCTs involving 3402 patients were included. For effective rate, TG 1.5 mg/kg/d (TG1.5) + TCM was ranked as the best intervention, followed by TG 1.0 mg/kg/d (TG1.0) + TCM, TG1.5, TG1.0+GC, TG1.0, TCM, GC, and routine treatment (RT). TG1.0+TCM ranked best in reducing recurrence, followed by TG1.0+GC, GC, TG1.5, and RT. Compared with TG1.0, TG1.0+TCM and TG1.5+TCM effectively reduced liver injury events. Compared with TG1.5, TG1.5+TCM and TG1.0+TCM effectively reduced leukopenia events. No significant differences in the reduction of gastrointestinal events were observed between the interventions. Subgroup analyses explored the effects of the participants' age. The intervention rankings of the outcomes generally remained consistent. Only a small difference was observed in gastrointestinal events. TCM was the best treatment for reducing gastrointestinal events in paediatric patients. Conclusions: The results showed a positive correlation between dose and efficacy, whereas no relationship was found between dose and adverse events. TCM can boost the efficacy and reduce adverse events when combined with TG. In conclusion, we consider TG1.5+TCM as the best treatment for IgAVN. However, further research is required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.