ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison of the effects of single injection and continuous infusion popliteal nerve block on pain and hemodynamics in diabetic foot surgery; prospective randomized clinical trial.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of spinal anesthesia on sensory and motor block in cesarean cases with a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In patients undergoing surgery due to diabetic foot complications from uncontrolled diabetes may lead to neuraxial or general anesthesia-related issues. Regional anesthesia techniques can be preferred to prevent these complications. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects and outcomes in terms of pain of continuous infusion and single injection methods of popliteal nerve block in patients undergoing surgery due to diabetic foot. Materials and methods: Sixty-three patients in ASA II-IV risk group scheduled for diabetic foot surgery were randomized into two groups for popliteal nerve block as the anesthesia method. Group 1 (n:32), 30 mL of local anesthetic was administered around the popliteal nerve under ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulator. Group 2 (n:31) had a catheter placed beyond the needle tip by 4-5 cm. An elastomeric pump was prepared for the infusion of 2 mL/h of 0.25 % bupivacaine through the catheter. Hemodynamic parameters before and after the block, onset, block duration times, postoperative pain scores, time to analgesic requirement, patient satisfaction, and discharge time were recorded. Results: Pain scores were higher in Group 1 after 12 h postoperatively and in Group 2 after 60 h postoperatively (p = 0.006, p < 0.01, respectively). The time to the first analgesic requirement was not statistically different between Group 1 (mean 804.64 ± 1020.8 min) and Group 2 (mean 2012.78 ± 1424 min) (p = 0.072). There was no significant difference in systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate between groups before and after successful blockade (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Continuous infusion method of popliteal nerve block provides a longer pain-free period. Both methods showed similar hemodynamic data and low pain scores. Although continuous infusion method provides better analgesia, its procedural cost, technical difficulties, and adverse effects on patient comfort should also be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.