Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39113867›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024

Interpretable deep learning model to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer using whole slide images.

You-Na Sung, Hyeseong Lee, Eunsu Kim, Woon Yong Jung, Jin-Hee Sohn, Yoo Jin Lee, Bora Keum, Sangjeong Ahn, Sung Hak Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence models in predicting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta -analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

You-Na SungDepartment of Pathology, Korea University Anam Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeseong LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University Seoul, South Korea.
Eunsu KimDepartment of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University Seoul, South Korea.
Woon Yong JungDepartment of Pathology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, College of Medicine, Hanyang University Guri, South Korea.
Jin-Hee SohnDepartment of Pathology, Samkwang Medical Laboratories Seoul, South Korea.
Yoo Jin LeeDepartment of Pathology, Korea University Anam Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University Seoul, South Korea.
Bora KeumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University Seoul, South Korea.
Sangjeong AhnDepartment of Pathology, Korea University Anam Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Hak LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In early gastric cancer (EGC), the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a crucial factor for determining the treatment options. Endoscopic resection is used for treatment of EGC with minimal risk of LNM. However, owing to the lack of definitive criteria for identifying patients who require additional surgery, some patients undergo unnecessary additional surgery. Considering that histopathologic patterns are significant factor for predicting lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer, we aimed to develop a machine learning algorithm which can predict LNM status using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained images. The images were obtained from several institutions. Our pipeline comprised two sequential approaches including a feature extractor and a risk classifier. For the feature extractor, a segmentation network (DeepLabV3+) was trained on 243 WSIs across three datasets to differentiate each histological subtype. The risk classifier was trained with XGBoost using 70 morphological features inferred from the trained feature extractor. The trained segmentation network, the feature extractor, achieved high performance, with pixel accuracies of 0.9348 and 0.8939 for the internal and external datasets in patch level, respectively. The risk classifier achieved an overall AUC of 0.75 in predicting LNM status. Remarkably, one of the datasets also showed a promising result with an AUC of 0.92. This is the first multi-institution study to develop machine learning algorithm for predicting LNM status in patients with EGC using H&E-stained histopathology images. Our findings have the potential to improve the selection of patients who require surgery among those with EGC showing high-risk histological features.

Indexed as

computational pathologydeep learningendoscopic resectionGastric cancerlymph node metastasismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39113867
PMCPMC11301296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.