Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39113835›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Evaluating the efficacy of microbial antagonists in inducing resistance, promoting growth, and providing biological control against powdery mildew in wheat.

Kariyappa R Choudaker, Vaibhav Kumar Singh, Abhijeet Shankar Kashyap, Aakash V Patel, Koshal K Sameriya, Dhananjay Yadav, Nazia Manzar, Deeba Kamil, Lakshman Prasad, M S Saharan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Field Evaluation of SpentJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kariyappa R ChoudakerWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Vaibhav Kumar SinghWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Abhijeet Shankar KashyapMolecular Biology Lab, ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Mau, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Aakash V PatelWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Koshal K SameriyaWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Dhananjay YadavWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Nazia ManzarMolecular Biology Lab, ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Mau, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Deeba KamilWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Lakshman PrasadWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
M S SaharanWheat Pathology Laboratory, Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the biocontrol efficacy of three bacterial strains

Indexed as

Bacillus amyloliquefaciensbiocontrolgrowth promotioninduce resistancemicrobial antagonistpolyphenol oxidase (PPO)Pseudomonas fluorescenswheat

Identifiers

PMID39113835
PMCPMC11304452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.