ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Virtual Outpatient Management of People With Mpox.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operationalizing a Hub-and-Spoke Telemedicine Model for Mpox Surveillance in a High-Alert, Zero-Prevalence Setting: An Observational Study, Real-World Experience From Iran.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Mpox Virus as a Global Public Health Emergency: A Scoping Review.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To report on the implementation and outcomes of a virtual ward established for the management of mpox during the 2022 outbreak, we conducted a 2-center, observational, cross-sectional study over a 3-month period. Methods: All patients aged ≥17 years with laboratory polymerase chain reaction-confirmed monkeypox virus managed between 14 May and 15 August 2022, at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and sexual health services at Central North and West London NHS Foundation Trust, were included. Main outcomes included the proportion of patients managed exclusively on the virtual ward, proportion of patients requiring inpatient admission, proportion of patients with human immunodeficiency virus, and duration of lesion reepithelialization. Results: Among confirmed cases (N = 221), 86% (191/221) were managed exclusively on the virtual ward, while 14% (30/221) required admission. Treatment for concomitant sexually transmitted infections was provided to 25% (55/221) of patients, antibiotics for other infective complications to 16% (35/221), and symptomatic relief to 27% (60/221). The median time from onset to complete lesion reepithelialization and de-isolation was 18 days (range, 8-56 days). Eleven percent (24/221) of individuals disengaged from services within 4 days of testing. Conclusions: The virtual ward model facilitated safe and holistic outpatient management of mpox, while minimizing admissions. This approach could serve as a model for future outbreak responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.