Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39113826›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Pathogen-Agnostic Advanced Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Difficult-to-Diagnose Clinical Syndromes-Results of an Emerging Infections Network Survey of Frontline US Infectious Disease Clinicians, May 2023.

Preetika S Rao, Diane L Downie, Corinne David-Ferdon, Susan E Beekmann, Scott Santibanez, Philip M Polgreen, Matthew Kuehnert, Sean Courtney, Justin S Lee, Jasmine Chaitram and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Preetika S RaoOffice of Public Health Data, Surveillance and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Diane L DownieOffice of Readiness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Corinne David-FerdonNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Susan E BeekmannEmerging Infections Network, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Scott SantibanezNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Philip M PolgreenEmerging Infections Network, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Matthew KuehnertNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sean CourtneyOffice of Laboratory Systems and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Justin S LeeGlobal Health Center, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jasmine ChaitramOffice of Laboratory Systems and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Reynolds M SalernoOffice of Laboratory Systems and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Adi V GundlapalliOffice of Public Health Data, Surveillance and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7423-7903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During routine clinical practice, infectious disease physicians encounter patients with difficult-to-diagnose clinical syndromes and may order advanced molecular testing to detect pathogens. These tests may identify potential infectious causes for illness and allow clinicians to adapt treatments or stop unnecessary antimicrobials. Cases of pathogen-agnostic disease testing also provide an important window into known, emerging, and reemerging pathogens and may be leveraged as part of national sentinel surveillance. A survey of Emerging Infections Network members, a group of infectious disease providers in North America, was conducted in May 2023. The objective of the survey was to gain insight into how and when infectious disease physicians use advanced molecular testing for patients with difficult-to-diagnose infectious diseases, as well as to explore the usefulness of advanced molecular testing and barriers to use. Overall, 643 providers answered at least some of the survey questions; 478 (74%) of those who completed the survey had ordered advanced molecular testing in the last two years, and formed the basis for this study. Respondents indicated that they most often ordered broad-range 16S rRNA gene sequencing, followed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing and whole genome sequencing; and commented that in clinical practice, some, but not all tests were useful. Many physicians also noted several barriers to use, including a lack of national guidelines and cost, while others commented that whole genome sequencing had potential for use in outbreak surveillance. Improving frontline physician access, availability, affordability, and developing clear national guidelines for interpretation and use of advanced molecular testing could potentially support clinical practice and public health surveillance.

Indexed as

Advanced molecular diagnostic testingEmerging infectionsMetagenomicsPathogen agnostic

Identifiers

PMID39113826
PMCPMC11304606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.