Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39113767›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Using old laboratory equipment with modern Web-of-Things standards: a smart laboratory with LabThings Retro.

Samuel McDermott, Jurij Kotar, Joel Collins, Leonardo Mancini, Richard Bowman, Pietro Cicuta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel McDermottCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-5467
Jurij KotarCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-5178
Joel CollinsDepartment of Physics, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-7511
Leonardo ManciniCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8906-1667
Richard BowmanDepartment of Physics, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-8199
Pietro CicutaCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-8496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an increasing, and welcome, open hardware trend towards science teams building and sharing their designs for new instruments. These devices, often built upon low-cost microprocessors and microcontrollers, can be readily connected to enable complex, automated and smart experiments. When designed to use open communication web standards, devices from different laboratories and manufacturers can be controlled using a single protocol and even communicate with each other. However, science labs still have a majority of old, perfectly functional equipment which tends to use older, and sometimes proprietary, standards for communications. In order to encourage the continued and integrated use of this equipment in modern automated experiments, we develop and demonstrate LabThings Retro. This allows us to retrofit old instruments to use modern Web-of-Things standards, which we demonstrate with closed-loop feedback involving an optical microscope, digital imaging and fluid pumping.

Indexed as

analytical instrumentationlaboratory automationsmart switches

Identifiers

PMID39113767
PMCPMC11304333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.