Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39113764›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Active head movements contribute to spatial updating across gaze shifts.

Manuel Bayer, Eckart Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Actions as perceptual experiments.Journal of vision · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manuel BayerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3717-2813
Eckart ZimmermannDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keeping visual space constant across movements of the eye and head is a not yet fully understood feature of perception. To understand the mechanisms that update the internal coordinates of space, research has mostly focused on eye movements. However, in natural vision, head movements are an integral part of gaze shifts that enlarge the field of vision. Here, we directly compared spatial updating for eye and head movements. In a virtual reality environment, participants had to localize the position of a stimulus across the execution of a gaze shift. We found that performing head movements increased the accuracy of spatial localization. By manipulating the speed of the visual scene displacement that a head movement produced, we found that spatial updating takes into account the sensorimotor contingencies of vision. When we presented gaze-contingent visual motion, subjects overestimated the position of stimuli presented across gaze shifts. The overestimation decreased if subjects were allowed to perform eye movements during the head movement. We conclude that head movements contribute to stabilizing visual space across gaze shifts and that contingencies of head movements, rather than being cancelled, facilitate the updating.

Indexed as

eye movementhead movementself-motionspace constancy

Identifiers

PMID39113764
PMCPMC11305413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.