ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024
RETRACTION: Microrna-379 Suppresses Osteosarcoma Progression by Targeting PDK1.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionLi, Z., Shen, J., Chan, M. T. V., and Wu, W. K. K. (2017). Microrna-379 Suppresses Osteosarcoma Progression by Targeting PDK1. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 21(2), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12966 The above article, published online on 25 October 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Stefan Constantinescu; The Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley and Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon following an investigation into concerns raised by a third party, which revealed inappropriate duplications of image panels (Figures 2D, 3, 4G, 6A and F) within the article and between this and other articles that were previously published or published shortly after in a different scientific context. The authors were unable to provide a satisfactory explanation and the provided raw data could not explain the identified issues, which has led the editors to lose confidence in the data presented. Therefore, the editors consider the conclusions substantially compromised and are retracting the paper. The co-author, J. Shen stated that they were not involved in this research and had no knowledge about its publication, and their correspondence email address was added without their consent. The authors, including Z. Li who submitted the manuscript, were informed of the decision to retract but did not respond to the retraction or the retraction wording.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.