Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39112984›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

A functional intervention within a cognitive approach to chronic cervical radiculopathy : Description of the non-surgical treatment arm in a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of surgery.

Kaia B Engebretsen, Mirad Taso, Siri Bjorland, Hanne K Jenssen, Helene Engberg Skaara, Jens Ivar Brox

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07240090 (Relation of Craniovertebral Angle With Lumbar Proprioception and Trunk Muscles Strength in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07240090 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Relation of Craniovertebral Angle With Lumbar Proprioception and Trunk Muscles Strength in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy

TypeobservationalSponsorBasma Ashraf Ali MohamedRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsCervical Radiculopathy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaia B EngebretsenDepartment of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. uxaien@ous-hf.no.
Mirad TasoDepartment of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Siri BjorlandDepartment of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hanne K JenssenDepartment of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Helene Engberg SkaaraDepartment of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jens Ivar BroxDepartment of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with cervical radiculopathy improve within the first months without treatment or with non-surgical treatment. A systematic review concluded that these patients improve, regardless of their intervention. Still, many patients are offered surgery, despite limited evidence regarding the indications for surgical treatments. The aim of this article is to describe the intervention that is going to be followed in the non-surgical treatment arm of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy.

methodsThe non-surgical intervention is a functional intervention within a cognitive approach founded on previous experiences, and current recommendations for best practice care of musculoskeletal pain and cervical radiculopathy. It is based on the biopsychosocial rather than a biomedical perspective, comprises an interdisciplinary approach (physicians, physiotherapy specialists), and includes brief intervention and graded activities. The intervention consists of 6 sessions over 12 weeks. The primary goals are first, to validate the patients´ symptoms and build a therapeutic alliance, second, to explore the understanding and promote alternatives, and third, to explore problems and opportunities based on patients´ symptoms and function. Motivational factors toward self-management are challenging. We will attempt shared decision-making in planning progress for the individual patient and emphasise learning of practical self-help strategies and encouragement to stay active (reinforcing the positive natural course). General physical activities such as walking will be promoted along with simple functional exercises for the neck- and shoulder region. We will also explore social activity, comorbidities, pain location, sleep, and work-related factors. The health providers will set individualised goals together with each patient. DISCUSSION: The aim of the intervention is to describe a functional intervention within a cognitive approach for patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy. The effectiveness of the present program will be compared to surgery in a randomised controlled trial.

Indexed as

RadiculopathyCervical VertebraeChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansNeck PainPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCervical radiculopathyCognitive approachFunctional interventionGraded activitiesIndividualised goalsNon-surgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID39112984
PMCPMC11308144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.