Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39112968›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Citizens' perspectives on healthy weight approaches in low SEP neighborhoods: a qualitative study from a systems perspective.

Maud J J Ter Bogt, Yentl Z Te Riele, Piet G C Kooijman, Anita N Heszler, Saskia van der Meer, Rob van Roon, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen, Kirsten E Bevelander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maud J J Ter BogtAMPHI Academic Collaborative Centre, Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, EZ, 6525, The Netherlands. maud.terbogt@radboudumc.nl.
Yentl Z Te RielePrimary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, EZ, 6525, The Netherlands.
Piet G C KooijmanMunicipal Health Service Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, TV, 6524, The Netherlands.
Anita N HeszlerMunicipal Health Service Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, TV, 6524, The Netherlands.
Saskia van der MeerMunicipal Health Service Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, TV, 6524, The Netherlands.
Rob van RoonMunicipal Health Service Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, TV, 6524, The Netherlands.
Gerard R M MollemanAMPHI Academic Collaborative Centre, Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, EZ, 6525, The Netherlands.
Maria van den MuijsenberghPrimary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, EZ, 6525, The Netherlands.
Gerdine A J FransenAMPHI Academic Collaborative Centre, Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, EZ, 6525, The Netherlands.
Kirsten E BevelanderAMPHI Academic Collaborative Centre, Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, EZ, 6525, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe physical and the social environment are important predictors of healthy weight, especially in low socioeconomic position (SEP) neighborhoods. Many Dutch municipalities have implemented a healthy weight approach (HWA). Yet, there is room for improvement. This system science study examined what influences the utilization of HWA facilities and activities, and what aspects can help to achieve a desired systems change (also called leverage point themes (LPTs)) in the HWA system as perceived by citizens living in low SEP neighborhoods.

methodAll research phases were performed with four citizens co-researchers. Forty-seven citizens living in low SEP neighborhoods were semi-structurally interviewed about the neighborhood HWA facilities and municipal HWA activities. A rapid coding qualitative analysis approach was applied per topic. The topics were citizens' healthy living description, personal circumstances, and satisfaction with foot and cycle paths, sports facilities, playgrounds, green spaces, museums and theaters, community centers, churches, healthcare, school, food supplies, contact with neighborhood, unfamiliar and/or unused activities, familiar and used activities, unavailable but desired (lacking) activities, and reaching citizens.

resultsThe utilization of HWA facilities and activities was influenced by the overarching themes of social cohesion, familiarity, reaching citizens, maintenance, safety, physical accessibility, financial accessibility, social accessibility, fit with personal context, and fit with the neighborhood's specific needs. Different overarching themes stood out across different facilities and activities. LPTs indicated the overarching themes needed in combination with one another for a specific activity or facility to increase utilization. For example, the LPT regarding foot and cycle paths was "accessible, safe, and maintained foot and cycle paths". The LPTs regarding familiar and used activities were "customized activities; information provision (e.g., about possibilities to join without paying); social contact, meeting others, and everyone feels included".

conclusionConducting inclusive qualitative research from a systems perspective among citizens living in low SEP neighborhoods has contributed valuable insights into their needs. This enables practical implementation of HWAs by providing a deeper understanding of the LPTs within the HWA system. LPTs can help HWA stakeholders to further develop current HWAs toward systems approaches. Future research could study the leverage points that may contribute to LPT implementation.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchResidence CharacteristicsAdultAgedFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSocial EnvironmentSystems AnalysisYoung AdultCitizen scienceHealthy weight approachLeverage pointsLiving environmentNeighborhoodsSocioeconomic positionSystem science

Identifiers

PMID39112968
PMCPMC11304654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.