ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Indications, operative techniques, and outcomes of occipital artery-vertebral artery bypass: an institutional series.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePosterior circulation cerebral bypasses often show higher risks and lower patency. Only few reports discussed occipital artery (OA)-vertebral artery (VA) bypasses. We present our illustrative cases to address current gaps in the literature on OA-VA bypass.
methodsA single-center retrospective review was conducted to include all institutional cases of OA-VA bypass, discussing the technique and outcomes.
resultsFour institutional cases undergoing a total of 5 bypasses were evaluated, including 3 males and 1 female, with median age of 65 years (range, 62-73). All patients had vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) with recurrent strokes/TIAs due to intracranial atherosclerosis, leading to unilateral VA stenosis with contralateral occlusion (1, 25%), bilateral VA stenosis (1, 25%) or occlusion (1, 25%). Medical management included aspirin for all cases (100%), with clopidogrel in 3 (75%). Surgery was performed through a far lateral approach, connecting the OA to the VA-3 segment, with no inter-positional graft. One patient underwent contralateral OA-VA bypass 6 months after the prior surgery due to worsening of the contralateral VA stenosis. Bypass patency was confirmed in all cases with post-operative angiography. All patients had clinical improvement, with one case of wound dehiscence managed conservatively. All patients were alive at last follow-up (median 7.0 months; range: 1.5-18).
conclusionOA-VA bypass is a challenging yet effective strategy in selected patients with VBI. Current literature lacks unique definitions of surgical indications and techniques, which we addressed in our series. Surgical education should focus on expanding the microsurgery anatomy knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39112907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.