ArticleEuropean radiology2025
An imaging-based model to predict the malignant potential of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving predictive accuracy for surgical indication of the current management guideline for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas via cutoff adjustments.European radiology · 2026Article
- Common cystic pancreatic neoplasms: A comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging-based review of typical and atypical imaging features.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) of the Pancreas: History, Myths, and Realities Between Past and Future.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Imaging-Based Risk Stratification of IPMN Using a Structured Imaging Score: A Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Differentiation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using arterial-phase CT radiomics combined with clinical features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Important radiological and clinicopathological risk factors for the recurrence of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms after surgical resection.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate imaging-based models for predicting the malignancy risk of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 241 IPMN patients who underwent preoperative CT and MRI for model development. Cyst size, presence and size of the enhancing mural nodule (EMN), main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter, thickened/enhancing cyst wall, abrupt MPD caliber change with distal atrophy, and lymphadenopathy were assessed. Multiple logistic regression models predicting malignancy risk were created using either continuous (Model C) or dichotomized variables (Model D) using these imaging features. Validation included internal (n = 55) and external (n = 43) datasets. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with that of the international guideline-based model (Model F).
resultsModel C identified age, EMN size, MPD diameter, and lymphadenopathy as independent predictors on CT, and age and presence and size of EMN on MRI. Model D identified age ≥ 68, cyst size ≥ 31 mm, EMN ≥ 6 mm, MPD ≥ 7 mm, and lymphadenopathy as independent predictors on CT, and age ≥ 68, EMN ≥ 4.5 mm, and lymphadenopathy on MRI. Model C (AUC, 0.763-0.899) performed slightly better than Model D (AUC, 0.753-0.912) without statistical significance. No significant difference was observed between Models C and F (AUC, 0.729-0.952). Combining Model C with obstructive jaundice improved performance (AUC, 0.802-0.941) without statistical significance.
conclusionOur imaging-based models effectively predicted the malignancy risk of IPMNs, comparable to international consensus guidelines. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Imaging features are important for predicting the malignant potential of IPMNs. Our imaging-based model may help determine surgical candidacy for patients with IPMNs. KEY POINTS: Non-invasively determining the malignant potential of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) allows for appropriate treatment decision-making We identified multiple imaging features that are associated with malignant transformation and developed models for this prediction. Our model performs comparably with international consensus guidelines in predicting the malignant potential of IPMNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39112752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.