ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024
[Migration background and loneliness among middle-aged and older adults in Germany].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, there is limited knowledge about the association between a migration background and loneliness among middle-aged and older individuals in Germany. The aim was therefore to examine the association between migration background and loneliness in this group.
methodsData were taken from the German Ageing Survey (Wave 7, November 2020 to March 2021), a representative sample of middle-aged and older individuals. The sample comprised 4145 individuals, and the mean age was 63.8 years. Of the respondents, 93.2% had no migration background, approximately 5.9% had a migration background with personal migration experience, and 0.9% had a migration background but no personal migration experience. The De Jong Gierveld tool was used to quantify loneliness.
resultsMultiple linear regressions showed that individuals with a migration background and their own migration experience have significantly higher levels of loneliness (β = 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004 to 0.30, p < 0.05) compared to individuals without a migration background, whereas individuals with a migration background without their own migration experience have significantly lower levels of loneliness (β = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.02 p < 0.05).
conclusionsIndividuals with a migration background and their own migration experience appear to represent a risk group for high loneliness among middle-aged and older adults in Germany. In this respect, this group should be given special consideration in corresponding measures. Against the background of current (and potential future) migration movements, the results are of great importance as these groups in particular could be affected by loneliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.