ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Feasibility Assessment of Robotic Major Hepatectomy and Bile Duct Resection in Klatskin Type IIIB Tumor with Concomitant Gallbladder Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitioning to the robotic era for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: initial implementation and outcomes in a single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: an expert consensus-based practical recommendation from the Korean Liver Cancer Association.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: an expert consensus-based practical recommendation from the Korean Liver Cancer Association.Journal of liver cancer · 2025Article
- Approaches in treating infiltrative common bile duct cancer: the potential of robotic hepatopancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2025Article
- Application of Robotic Surgery in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadical resection is the only curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor), the most common type of bile duct cancer.
methodsA 74-year-old woman was referred to surgery after biliary drainage due to obstructive jaundice. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed via endobiliary brushing, with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) showing a polypoid mass in the gallbladder and a 3-cm enhancing mass in the perihilar area. No signs of distant metastasis were present. Thus, robotic left hepatectomy including segment 1, partial hepatectomy of segment 5, and bile duct resection were performed (see video).
resultsThe total operative time was 419 min, with an estimated blood loss of 300 ml. Computed tomography on postoperative day 5 showed no abnormal findings, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 10 without complications. The final pathologic results confirmed the double primary adenocarcinomas with clear resection margins of 6.4 cm and 3.8 cm, respectively, and 11 lymph nodes all were negative for malignancy.
conclusionsThis case exemplifies the safety and effectiveness of robotic surgery for Klatskin tumors, even with concomitant gallbladder cancer, and demonstrates the benefits and potential of this technique in complex surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39112737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.