Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39112732›Full record

Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2024

Incidence and long-term outcomes of upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with intracardiac devices: analysis of bleeding, recurrence, and sequelae.

Marta-Olimpia Lago-Rodríguez, Marina López-Rubio, Sergio Moragón-Ledesma, Crhistian-Mario Oblitas, Francisco Galeano-Valle, Felipe Atienza, Alejandro Carta, Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marta-Olimpia Lago-Rodríguez *Venous Thromboembolism Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Marina López-Rubio *Venous Thromboembolism Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. marinalopezrubio@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8627-304X
Sergio Moragón-LedesmaVenous Thromboembolism Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Crhistian-Mario OblitasVenous Thromboembolism Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Galeano-ValleVenous Thromboembolism Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Felipe AtienzaSchool of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Alejandro CartaSanitary Research Institute Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Demelo-RodríguezVenous Thromboembolism Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pacemakers (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are vital devices in contemporary clinical practice, but their growing adoption poses challenges. Complications, including lead migration, infections, and post-implantation venous thrombosis, underscore the importance of comprehensive investigation. This retrospective observational study enrolled patients diagnosed with upper limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) secondary to intracardiac devices at a tertiary hospital from 2015 to 2022. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and long-term outcomes (bleeding, DVT recurrence and sequelae) in these patients. Across the study period, 2681 intracardiac devices were implanted, with 12 cases of upper limb DVT documented. The majority of patients were male (91.7%), with a mean age of 63.92 years. DVT occurred in patients with PM (50%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (25%) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (25%). Treatment encompassed low-molecular-weight heparin (91.7%) during the acute episode and long-term anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (75%) or vitamin K antagonists (25%). Over a mean follow-up period of 33.17 months, half of the patients exhibited long-term sequelae, notably collateral circulation (66.7%). Remarkably, no thrombosis recurrences were observed during follow-up. However, one patient (8.3%) experienced a major bleeding event during treatment, and one patient (8.3%) required device removal (PM) due to persistent symptoms. This study revealed upper limb DVT occurred in 0.45% of patients after intracardiac device implantation. Rate of thrombosis recurrence was low during follow-up. Although half of the patients developed long-term sequelae, the need for prolonged anticoagulant therapy in these cases remains uncertain.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantablePacemaker, ArtificialAgedAnticoagulantsFemaleHemorrhageHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesUpper ExtremityUpper Extremity Deep Vein ThrombosisVenous ThrombosisAnticoagulantsImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsPacemakersUpper limb deep vein thrombosisVenous thrombosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.