ReviewInsights into imaging2024
Beyond the otoscope: an imaging review of congenital cholesteatoma.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Staging of middle ear cholesteatoma surgery and its value for clinical decision-making].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Limitations, Patient Characteristics, and Confounding Factors Impacting Neurotologic Lesion Imaging: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intracranial ependymoma grade II with lipomatous metaplasia: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multimodal imaging in conductive hearing loss: Optimising CT, MRI and CTA for accurate diagnosis and management.SA journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Improved Cholesteatoma Removal with CADISS: A Quantitative Ultrastructural Comparison Using VP-SEM.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Biology of recurrent cholesteatoma in a Romanian young patient - a case report.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital cholesteatoma (CC) is a non-neoplastic lesion of keratin debris lined by epithelium found in the temporal bone. It is the lesser-known sibling of the acquired cholesteatoma and may be classified as congenital middle ear cholesteatoma and congenital petrous bone cholesteatoma. The incidence is rising, probably owing to increased recognition and advances in imaging modalities. Cone beam CT provides detailed anatomical information, highlighting quadrant location, ossicular involvement, and mastoid extension. MRI aids in lesion characterization and detection of complications. The classification systems for congenital middle ear and petrous bone cholesteatoma are helpful in the preoperative workup and have a role in predicting postoperative recurrence rates. Management almost invariably involves surgical intervention aimed at preserving middle and inner ear function. Follow-up of CC is mainly based on MRI together with otoscopic examination. Non-echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging, especially, has proven essential for detecting residual disease. This review article emphasizes the significance of imaging in the timely diagnosis and management of CCs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This article underscores the crucial role of imaging for prompt detection, preoperative assessment, and postoperative follow-up of CCs, a condition with rising incidence associated with potentially severe complications. KEY POINTS: Timely diagnosis of CCs is imperative for avoiding complications. Imaging is key in detection, preoperative evaluation, and postoperative management. Cone Beam CT and non-echo planar DWI represent state-of-the-art imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.