Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39112713›Full record

ArticleNature2024

Titration of RAS alters senescent state and influences tumour initiation.

Adelyne S L Chan, Haoran Zhu, Masako Narita, Liam D Cassidy, Andrew R J Young, Camino Bermejo-Rodriguez, Aleksandra T Janowska, Hung-Chang Chen, Sarah Gough, Naoki Oshimori and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Adelyne S L Chan *Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2214-0306
Haoran Zhu *Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3879-0389
Masako NaritaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9774-4908
Liam D CassidyCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andrew R J YoungCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-5525
Camino Bermejo-RodriguezDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-1640
Aleksandra T JanowskaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3104-3542
Hung-Chang ChenCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah GoughCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-9659
Naoki OshimoriDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Lars ZenderDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7626-2849
Sarah J AitkenCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-4140
Matthew HoareCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-9604
Masashi NaritaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Masashi.Narita@cruk.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-577X

Funding

Mechanisms of cellular crosstalk in tumor-promoting niche formationR01CA245535 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI OSHIMORI, NAOKI · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
Cancer Research UK 19159Medical Research Council MR/X00970X/1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncogenic RAS-induced senescence (OIS) is an autonomous tumour suppressor mechanism associated with premalignancy

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisCellular SenescenceHepatocytesLiver NeoplasmsOncogene Protein p21(ras)AnimalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsPhenotypeSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsNRAS protein, humanNras protein, mouseOncogene Protein p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID39112713
PMCPMC11410659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.