Trial reportMusculoskeletal surgery2025
Suprascapular nerve blocks with 5 mL × 10 mL in the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis: pilot study of clinical trial.
Trial report in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adhesive capsulitis: current concepts.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-guided anterior suprascapular nerve block reduces respiratory complications compared to interscalene block in elderly patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether 5 mL would not be less effective than 10 mL when performing a suprascapular nerve block, regarding shoulder function and quality of life in primary adhesive capsulitis.
methodsThis is a pilot study of a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted at a single center. Patients with AC characterized by constant pain and restricted movements in anterior elevation, 0°/90° external rotation, and internal rotation were selected. Two groups were randomly selected. In group I, a dose of 10 mL of bupivacaine was applied, while in group II, only 5 mL, in four weekly blocks. Sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes were used. The SF-36 and DASH questionnaires were applied in five moments. The t-Student test was used to compare the means, with a probability of rejecting null hypothesis of 5%.
resultsThere were 17 participants with primary AC, seven in group I and 10 in group II. The average age was 54.30 and 50.43 years in the 5 mL and 10 mL groups, respectively. There were no differences when the means were compared by DASH: T0 (p = 0.074); T2 (p = 0.285); T4 (p = 0.333); T8 (p = 0.392), and T12 (p = 0.453). As for the SF-36, there were sparse differences in T2 in the domains of vitality (p = 0.006) and social aspects (p = 0.036) in favor of group I, and in the general health status domain in T8, in favor of group II (p = 0.033).
conclusionThe volume of 5 mL is not less effective than 10 mL when performing SSNB in the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39112695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.