Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39112695›Full record

Trial reportMusculoskeletal surgery2025

Suprascapular nerve blocks with 5 mL × 10 mL in the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis: pilot study of clinical trial.

M R Fernandes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adhesive capsulitis: current concepts.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M R FernandesAdvisor Professor of Stricto Sensu Post-Graduated Program and Associate Professor of Orthopaedy and Traumatology Department, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, Rua 235 s/n Setor Universitário CEP: 74605-020. marcosombro@ufg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8078-528X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether 5 mL would not be less effective than 10 mL when performing a suprascapular nerve block, regarding shoulder function and quality of life in primary adhesive capsulitis.

methodsThis is a pilot study of a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted at a single center. Patients with AC characterized by constant pain and restricted movements in anterior elevation, 0°/90° external rotation, and internal rotation were selected. Two groups were randomly selected. In group I, a dose of 10 mL of bupivacaine was applied, while in group II, only 5 mL, in four weekly blocks. Sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes were used. The SF-36 and DASH questionnaires were applied in five moments. The t-Student test was used to compare the means, with a probability of rejecting null hypothesis of 5%.

resultsThere were 17 participants with primary AC, seven in group I and 10 in group II. The average age was 54.30 and 50.43 years in the 5 mL and 10 mL groups, respectively. There were no differences when the means were compared by DASH: T0 (p = 0.074); T2 (p = 0.285); T4 (p = 0.333); T8 (p = 0.392), and T12 (p = 0.453). As for the SF-36, there were sparse differences in T2 in the domains of vitality (p = 0.006) and social aspects (p = 0.036) in favor of group I, and in the general health status domain in T8, in favor of group II (p = 0.033).

conclusionThe volume of 5 mL is not less effective than 10 mL when performing SSNB in the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalBupivacaineBursitisNerve BlockAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineAdhesive capsulitisChronic painNerve blockQuality of lifeShoulder

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.