Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39112689›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Exploring bone density analysis on routine CT scans as a tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Nadia A du Fossé, Willem Grootjans, Ana Navas, Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra, Carlos V Elzo Kraemer, David J van Westerloo, Evert de Jonge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Opportunistic Screening on Chest CT, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadia A du FosséDepartment of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Willem GrootjansDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ana NavasDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Natasha M Appelman-DijkstraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Bone Quality, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carlos V Elzo KraemerDepartment of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
David J van WesterlooDepartment of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evert de JongeDepartment of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. e.dejonge@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT)-based bone density analysis at the level of thoracic vertebra 12 (Th12) as a screening method for decreased bone density in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Interobserver variability was analyzed. Secondary aims were to assess the prevalence of CT-based low bone density upon ICU admission in a cohort of COVID-19 patients and to assess the potential effect of long-term ICU stay on bone density in these patients. Retrospective single-center cohort study. ICU of the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), the Netherlands. Patients admitted to the ICU of the LUMC between March 1st, 2020 and February 1st, 2022 with a diagnosis of COVID-19, and a length of ICU stay of ≥ 21 days. In the included patients both baseline chest CT scans (obtained upon ICU admission) and follow-up chest CT scans (obtained ≥ 21 days after ICU admission) were available for analysis. A total of 118 CT scans in 38 patients were analyzed. There was a good interobserver variability, with an overall mean absolute difference (between measurements of three observers) of 9.7 Hounsfield Units (HU) and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.96). The effect of intravenous contrast administration on bone density measurements was small (+ 7.5 HU (95% CI 3.4-11.5 HU)) higher in contrast enhanced CT images compared to non contrast enhanced CT images). Thirty-seven percent of patients had a bone density < 140 HU, suggestive of osteoporosis. No significant difference was found between bone density upon ICU admission and bone density at follow-up (≥ 21 days after ICU admission). Vertebral CT-based bone density analysis using routine CT scans is an easily applicable method to identify ICU patients with decreased bone density, which could enable enrollment in osteoporosis prevention programs. A high prevalence of low bone density was found in our cohort of ICU patients. There were no changes observed in bone density between baseline and follow-up measurements.

Indexed as

Bone DensityCOVID-19OsteoporosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Thoracic VertebraeBone densityComputed tomographyCOVID-19Intensive careOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID39112689
PMCPMC11306341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.