Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39112668›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024

Clinical characteristics, predisposing factors and outcomes for Enterococcus faecalis versus Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Fenna Scharloo, Francesco Cogliati Dezza, Inmaculada López-Hernández, Pedro María Martínez Pérez-Crespo, Ane Josune Goikoetxea Aguirre, María Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez, Jonathan Fernandez-Suarez, Eva León Jiménez, Miguel Ángel Morán Rodríguez, Isabel Fernández-Natal and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ManagingEClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Genomic epidemiology ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Observational
  6. [In vitro and in vivo antibacterial effects of the mitochondrial antioxidant Visomitin againstZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Fenna Scharloo *Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Francesco Cogliati Dezza *Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Inmaculada López-HernándezDepartamento de Medicina, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Universidad de Sevilla, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC, Seville, Spain.
Pedro María Martínez Pérez-CrespoUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme, Seville, Spain.
Ane Josune Goikoetxea AguirreUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Bizkaia, Spain.
María Teresa Pérez-RodríguezDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Jonathan Fernandez-SuarezHospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Eva León JiménezUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme, Seville, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Morán RodríguezUnidad de Gestión Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Isabel Fernández-NatalHospital Universitario de León, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain.
José María Reguera IglesiasServicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, IBIMA Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Clara Natera KindelánUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain.
Maria Carmen Fariñas ÁlvaresCIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía Boix-PalopInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis Eduardo Lopez-Cortes *Departamento de Medicina, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Universidad de Sevilla, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC, Seville, Spain. llopez14@us.es.
Jesús Rodríguez-Baño *Departamento de Medicina, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Universidad de Sevilla, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC, Seville, Spain.
PROBAC/GEIRAS-SEIMC/SAMICEI group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesEnterococcal BSI is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with fatality rates of approximately 20-30%. There are microbiological and clinical differences between E. faecalis and E. faecium infections. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in predisposing factors for E. faecalis and E. faecium BSI and to explore prognostic factors.

methodsThis study was a post-hoc analysis of PROBAC, a Spanish prospective, multicenter, cohort in 2016-2017. Patients with E. faecalis or E. faecium BSI were eligible. Independent predictors for BSI development in polymicrobial and monomicrobial BSI and in-hospital mortality in the monomicrobial group were identified by logistic regression.

resultsA total of 431 patients were included. Independent factors associated with E. faecium BSI were previous use of penicillins (aOR 1.99 (95% CI 1.20-3.32)) or carbapenems (2.35 (1.12-4.93)), hospital-acquired BSI (2.58 (1.61-4.12)), and biliary tract source (3.36 (1.84-6.13)), while congestive heart failure (0.51 (0.27-0.97)), cerebrovascular disease (0.45 (0.21-0.98)), and urinary tract source (0.49 (0.26-0.92)) were associated with E. faecalis BSI. Independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality in E. faecalis BSI were Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.27 (1.08-1.51)), SOFA score (1.47 (1.24-1.73)), age (1.06 (1.02-1.10)), and urinary/biliary source (0.29 (0.09-0.90)). For E. faecium BSI, only SOFA score (1.34 (1.14-1.58) was associated with in-hospital mortality.

conclusionsThe factors associated with E. faecium and E. faecalis BSI are different. These variables may be helpful in the suspicion of one or other species for empiric therapeutic decisions and provide valuable information on prognosis.

Indexed as

BacteremiaEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBloodstream infectionEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumMortalityPrognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID39112668
PMCPMC11405461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.