ArticleScientific reports2024
Puzzle: taking livestock tracking to the next level.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence in small ruminant production systems: applications, performance outcomes, and reported implementation challenges.BMC veterinary research · 2026Pooled it
- BiAF: research on dynamic goat herd detection and tracking based on machine vision.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal behavior is a critical aspect for a better understanding and management of animal health and welfare. The combination of cameras with artificial intelligence holds significant potential, particularly as it eliminates the need to handle animals and allows for the simultaneous measurement of various traits, including activity, space utilization, and inter-individual distance. The primary challenge in using these techniques is dealing with the individualization of data, known as the multiple object tracking problem in computer science. In this article, we propose an original solution called "Puzzle." Similar to solving a puzzle, where you start with the border pieces that are easy to position, our approach involves commencing with video sequences where tracking is straightforward. This initial phase aims to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) capable of deriving the appearance clues of each animal. The CNN is then used on the entire video, together with distance-based metrics, in order to associate detections and animal id. We illustrated our method in the context of outdoor goat tracking, achieving a high percentage of good tracking, exceeding 90%. We discussed the impact of different criteria used for animal ID association, considering whether they are based solely on location, appearance, or a combination of both. Our findings indicate that, by adopting the puzzle paradigm and tailoring the appearance CNN to the specific video, relying solely on appearance can yield satisfactory results. Finally, we explored the influence of tracking efficacy on two behavioral studies, estimating space utilization and activity. The results demonstrated that the estimation error remained below 10%. The code is entirely open-source and extensively documented. Additionally, it is linked to a data-paper to facilitate the training of any automatic detection algorithm for goats, with the goal of fostering open access within the deep-learning livestock community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.