ArticleScientific reports2024
Bidirectional Mendelian randomization to explore the causal relationships between the gut microbiota and male reproductive diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota and their role in male reproductive health.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- Qiangjing Tablets modulate oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress through the PI3K/Akt/NRF-2 signaling axis and regulate gut microbiota in ornidazole-induced asthenozoospermia rats.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2026Article
- L-citrulline protects testicular Sertoli cell function by mitigating DNA damage via the gut-testis axis of sheep fed a high-concentrate diet.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota and risk of cervical cancer: a Mendelian multivariable randomization study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Lifestyle on Reproductive Health: Microbial Complexity, Hormonal Dysfunction, and Pregnancy Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Calcium Channels and Modulators as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Contraceptives and Male Fertility: A Scoping Review.Open access journal of contraception · 2025Review
- Article
- Macronutrient balance determines the human gut microbiome eubiosis: insights fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gut bacteria might play an important role in male reproductive disorders, such as male infertility and sperm abnormalities; however, their causal role is unclear. Herein, Mendelian randomization (MR)-Egger, weighted median, inverse variance weighting, Simple mode, and Weighted mode were used to test the causal relationship between gut microbes and male reproductive diseases. The MR results were validated using various metrics. The MR results were also consolidated using reverse causality speculation, conducted using two-way MR analysis and Steiger filtering. Biological function was analysed using enrichment analyses. The results suggested that eight intestinal microflorae were causally associated with male infertility. The Eubacterium oxidoreducens group was associated with an increased risk of male infertility, while the family Bacteroidaceae was negatively associated with male reproductive diseases. Eight intestinal microflorae were causally associated with abnormal spermatozoa. The family Streptococcaceae was associated with a high risk of abnormal spermatozoa, whereas the family Porphyromonadaceae was associated with a low risk of abnormal spermatozoa. No pleiotropy was observed, this study identified a high correlation between the gut flora and the likelihood of male reproductive diseases. Future research will attempt to advance microbial-focused treatments for such diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.