Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39111742›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2024

Steady as they hover: kinematics of kestrel wing and tail morphing during hovering flights.

Mario Martinez Groves-Raines, George Yi, Matthew Penn, Simon Watkins, Shane Windsor, Abdulghani Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mario Martinez Groves-RainesRMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-2601-334X
George YiRMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Matthew PennRMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Simon WatkinsRMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5550-4941
Shane WindsorDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-4497
Abdulghani MohamedRMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9592-1034

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-19-1-7017Australian Defence Science InstituteAustralian GovernmentRMIT UniversityUniversity of Bristol
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wind-hovering birds exhibit remarkable steadiness in flight, achieved through the morphing of their wings and tail. We analysed the kinematics of two nankeen kestrels (Falco cenchroides) engaged in steady wind-hovering flights in a smooth flow wind tunnel. Motion-tracking cameras were used to capture the movements of the birds as they maintained their position. The motion of the birds' head and body, and the morphing motions of their wings and tail were tracked and analysed using correlation methods. The results revealed that wing sweep, representing the flexion/extension movement of the wing, played a significant role in wing motion. Additionally, correlations between different independent degrees of freedom (DoF), including wing and tail coupling, were observed. These kinematic couplings indicate balancing of forces and moments necessary for steady wind hovering. Variation in flight behaviour between the two birds highlighted the redundancy of DoF and the versatility of wing morphing in achieving control. This study provides insights into fixed-wing craft flight control from the avian world and may inspire novel flight control strategies for future fixed-wing aircraft.

Indexed as

FalconiformesFlight, AnimalTailWings, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaWindAgilityCouplingsDegrees of freedomLocomotor dynamicsStabilityWind hovering

Identifiers

PMID39111742
PMCPMC11418201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.