ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
American Association for Thoracic Surgery Quality Gateway: A surgeon case study of its application in adult cardiac surgery for quality assurance.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of American Association for Thoracic Surgery Quality Gateway outcome models, analytics, and visualizations for quality assurance.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Harnessing the power of virtual (digital) twins: Graphical causal tools for understanding patient and hospital differences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo demonstrate the application of American Association for Thoracic Surgery Quality Gateway (AQG) outcomes models to a Surgeon Case Study of quality assurance in adult cardiac surgery.
methodsThe case study includes 6989 cardiac and thoracic aorta operations performed in adults at Cleveland Clinic by a single surgeon between 2001 and 2023. AQG models were used to predict expected probabilities for operative mortality and major morbidity and to compare hospital outcomes, surgery type, risk profile, and individual risk factor levels using virtual (digital) twin causal inference. These models were based on postoperative procedural outcomes after 52,792 cardiac operations performed in 19 hospitals of 3 high-performing hospital systems with overall hospital mortality of 2.0%, analyzed by advanced machine learning for rare events.
resultsFor individual surgeons, their patients, hospitals, and hospital systems, the Surgeon Case Study demonstrated that AQG provides expected outcomes across the entire spectrum of cardiac surgery, from single-component primary operations to complex multicomponent reoperations. Actionable opportunities for quality improvement based on virtual twins are illustrated for patients, surgeons, hospitals, risk profile groups, operations, and risk factors vis-à-vis other hospitals.
conclusionsUsing minimal data collection and models developed using advanced machine learning, this case study shows that probabilities can be generated for operative mortality and major morbidity after virtually all adult cardiac operations. It demonstrates the utility of 21st century causal inference (virtual [digital] twin) tools for assessing quality for surgeons asking "how am I doing?," their patients asking "what are my chances?," and the profession asking "how can we get better?"
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.