Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39111623›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2025

Impacts of parental genomic divergence in non-syntenic regions on cotton heterosis.

Chujun Huang, Yu Cheng, Yan Hu, Xuemei Zhang, Jinwen Chen, Ting Zhao, Zhanfeng Si, Yiwen Cao, Yiqian Li, Lei Fang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chujun HuangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yu ChengZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yan HuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Xuemei ZhangAnnoroad Gene Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China.
Jinwen ChenZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Ting ZhaoZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhanfeng SiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yiwen CaoZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Yiqian LiZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Lei FangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Xueying GuanZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Tianzhen ZhangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China. Electronic address: cotton@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeterosis has revolutionized crop breeding, enhancing global agricultural production. However, the mechanisms underlying heterosis remain obscure. Xiangzamian 2# (XZM2), a super hybrid upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) characterized by high-yield heterosis, has been developed and extensively planted in China.

objectivesWe conducted a systematic analysis of CRI12 and J8891, two parents of XZM2. We aimed to reveal the precise genetic information and the role of non-syntenic divergence in shaping heterosis, laying a foundation for advancing understanding of heterosis.

methodsWe de novo assembled high-quality genomes of CRI12 and J8891, and further uncovered abundant genetic variations and non-syntenic regions between the parents. Whole-genome comparison, association analysis, transcriptomic analysis and relative identity-by-descent (rIBD) estimation were conducted to identify structural variations (SVs) and introgressions within non-syntenic blocks and to analyze their impacts on promoting heterosis.

resultsParental genetic divergence increased in non-syntenic regions. Furthermore, these regions, accounting for only 16.71% of the total genome, contained more loci with significantly higher heterotic effects, far exceeding the syntenic background. SVs covered 97.26% of non-syntenic sequences and caused widespread gene expression differences in these regions, driving dynamic complementation of gene expression in the hybrid. A set of SVs were responsible for trait improvement and had positive effects on heterosis, contributing larger heritability than short variations. We characterized numerous parental-specific introgressions from G. barbadense. Specifically, a functional introgression segment within non-syntenic blocks introduced an elite haplotype, which significantly increased lint yield and enhanced heterosis.

conclusionOur study clarified non-syntenic regions to harbor more loci with higher heterotic effects, revealed their importance in promoting heterosis and supported the crucial role of genetic complementation in heterosis. SVs and introgressions were identified as key factors responsible for non-syntenic divergence between the parents. They had important effects on gene expression and trait improvement, positively contributing to heterosis.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGossypiumHybrid VigorGenetic VariationGenomicsPlant BreedingHeterosisIntrogressionNon-syntenic regionParental genomeStructural variationUpland cotton

Identifiers

PMID39111623
PMCPMC12225900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.