Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39111239›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2024

Effect of genotype and outdoor enrichment on productive performance and meat quality of slow growing chickens.

Simona Mattioli, Elisa Angelucci, Cesare Castellini, Alice Cartoni Mancinelli, Wei Chenggang, Francesca Di Federico, Diletta Chiattelli, Alessandro Dal Bosco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prediction of Enhancer RNAs in Chicken Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simona MattioliDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy. Electronic address: simona.mattioli@unipg.it.
Elisa AngelucciDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy.
Cesare CastelliniDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy.
Alice Cartoni MancinelliDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy.
Wei ChenggangDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy.
Francesca Di FedericoDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy.
Diletta ChiattelliDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy.
Alessandro Dal BoscoDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia 06124, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimization of animal welfare, meat quality, environmental impact, and economic sustainability in alternative poultry farming can be achieved by modulating several productive factors and improving the synergy between the chicken genotype and the outdoor environment. The objective of the study was to characterize 4 slow-growing chicken genotypes reared in free range conditions. Eight hundred chickens (SGs; 25 chickens/replicates/genotype/enrichment) belonging to the following genotypes, Red JA57 (RJ), Naked Neck (NN), Lohmann Dual meat-type (LD), and an Italian crossbreed (Robusta Maculata x Sasso, CB). were utilised and slaughtered at 81 d: The grazing areas were alternatively provided with enrichment constituted by strips of sorghum plants (ENR) or only grass (NO ENR). Productive performance (daily weight gain, daily feed intake, feed conversion ratio, live weight) were recorded weekly. Behaviour observations (walking and grass pecking), carcass and meat quality of breast and drumstick were also assessed in 15 chickens/replicate/genotypes/enrichment. Results demonstrated that both LD and CB showed the highest walking activity, but the different strains were differently capable of using the foraging resources (eating grass). The better productive performance was recorded in RJ followed by NN, CB and LD. In LD and CB, the different walking activities also affected the physico-chemical profiles (lower pHu, WHC, and lipids) of the breast and drumstick. The oxidative status was worse in CB than in the other groups (lower tocols, higher carbonyls), in both meat cuts. Fatty acid profile was also related to the genetic strain: a higher amount of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids was recorded both in the breast and drumstick of RJ and NN. The Healthy Fatty Index resulted excellent in all the chicken genotypes. In conclusion, the environment/animal interaction resulted as an important factor affecting the adaptability of genotypes to an extensive rearing system. All four genotypes, to different extents, showed good adaptability and production performance, with the exception of LD and CB, which were too light for the commercial supply chain requirements.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryChickensGenotypeMeatAnimal FeedAnimalsFemaleHousing, AnimalMaleSorghumchickenmeat qualityperformancerange enrichmentslow growing genotype

Identifiers

PMID39111239
PMCPMC11350495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.