Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110921›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2024

Esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer: a safe therapeutic strategy.

Eline G M van Geffen, Karen J Neelis, Hein Putter, Marije Slingerland, Wobbe O de Steur, Jolein van der Kraan, Aart J van der Molen, A Stijn L P Crobach, Henk H Hartgrink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eline G M van GeffenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-0633
Karen J NeelisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marije SlingerlandDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wobbe O de SteurDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jolein van der KraanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Aart J van der MolenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A Stijn L P CrobachDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henk H HartgrinkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy damages the surrounding tissue, which potentially increases the risk of postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage. The impact of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT, 50.4 Gy radiotherapy) compared to the standard neoadjuvant scheme (nCRT, 41.4 Gy radiotherapy) prior to surgery on the incidence of anastomotic leakage remains poorly understood. To study this, all patients who received dCRT between 2011 and 2021 followed by esophagectomy were included. For each patient, two patients who received nCRT were selected as matched controls. Outcomes included postoperative anastomotic leakage, pulmonary and other complications, anastomotic stenosis, pulmonary and other postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo Classification ≥1), and overall survival. One hundred and eight patients were included with a median follow-up of 28 months. The time between neoadjuvant treatment and surgery was longer in the dCRT group compared to the nCRT group (65 vs. 48 days, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, significantly more patients in the dCRT group suffered from anastomotic leakage (11% vs. 1%, P = 0.04) and anastomotic stenosis (42% vs. 17%, P < 0.01). No differences were found for other complications or overall survival between both groups. In conclusion, preoperative dCRT is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage and stenosis. These complications, however, can be treated effectively. Therefore, esophagectomy after dCRT is considered to be an appropriate treatment strategy in a selected patient group.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeanastomotic leakagechemoradiationesophageal cancer surgeryesophagectomytherapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID39110921
PMCPMC11518934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.