ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Transformer-Based Deep Learning Prediction of 10-Degree Humphrey Visual Field Tests From 24-Degree Data.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accurate Prediction of Humphrey 10-2 Visual Fields in Glaucoma from a Single Rapid IMOvifa 24plus(1-2).Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To predict 10-2 Humphrey visual fields (VFs) from 24-2 VFs and associated non-total deviation features using deep learning. Methods: We included 5189 reliable 24-2 and 10-2 VF pairs from 2236 patients, and 28,409 reliable pairs of macular OCT scans and 24-2 VF from 19,527 eyes of 11,560 patients. We developed a transformer-based deep learning model using 52 total deviation values and nine VF test features to predict 68 10-2 total deviation values. The mean absolute error, root mean square error, and the R2 were evaluation metrics. We further evaluated whether the predicted 10-2 VFs can improve the structure-function relationship between macular thinning and paracentral VF loss in glaucoma. Results: The average mean absolute error and R2 for 68 10-2 VF test points were 3.30 ± 0.52 dB and 0.70 ± 0.11, respectively. The accuracy was lower in the inferior temporal region. The model placed greater emphasis on 24-2 VF points near the central fixation point when predicting the 10-2 VFs. The inclusion of nine VF test features improved the mean absolute error and R2 up to 0.17 ± 0.06 dB and 0.01 ± 0.01, respectively. Age was the most important 24-2 VF test parameter for 10-2 VF prediction. The predicted 10-2 VFs achieved an improved structure-function relationship between macular thinning and paracentral VF loss, with the R2 at the central 4, 12, and 16 locations of 24-2 VFs increased by 0.04, 0.05 and 0.05, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The 10-2 VFs may be predicted from 24-2 data. Translational Relevance: The predicted 10-2 VF has the potential to improve glaucoma diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.