Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110462›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Neonatal Mortality Disparities by Gestational Age in European Countries.

Victor Sartorius, Marianne Philibert, Kari Klungsoyr, Jeannette Klimont, Katarzyna Szamotulska, Zeljka Drausnik, Petr Velebil, Laust Mortensen, Mika Gissler, Jeanne Fresson and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Outcomes at 21 weeks' gestation: a case series with neurodevelopmental follow-up.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Victor SartoriusCRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPe, INSERM, INRA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Marianne PhilibertCRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPe, INSERM, INRA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Kari KlungsoyrDivision of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
Jeannette KlimontUnit Demography and Health, Directorate Social Statistics, Statistics Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Katarzyna SzamotulskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Zeljka DrausnikDivision of Public Health, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Petr VelebilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Laust MortensenSection for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mika GisslerDepartment of Knowledge Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Jeanne FressonCRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPe, INSERM, INRA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jan NijhuisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, MUMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Wei-Hong ZhangInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Karin KällénSwedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Department of Analysis, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tonia A RihsFederal Statistical Office (FSO), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Vlad TicaFaculty of Medicine, East European Institute for Reproductive Health, Academy of Romanian Scientists, University 'Ovidius' Constanţa, Constanța, Romania.
Ruth MatthewsDepartment of Population Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Lucy SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Jennifer ZeitlinCRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPe, INSERM, INRA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Euro-Peristat Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are wide disparities in neonatal mortality rates (NMRs, deaths <28 days of life after live birth per 1000 live births) between countries in Europe, indicating potential for improvement. Comparing country-specific patterns of births and deaths with countries with low mortality rates can facilitate the development of effective intervention strategies. Objective: To investigate how these disparities are associated with the distribution of gestational age (GA) and GA-specific mortality rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study of all live births in 14 participating European countries using routine data compiled by the Euro-Peristat Network. Live births with a GA of 22 weeks or higher from 2015 to 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from May to October 2023. Exposures: GA at birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study investigated excess neonatal mortality, defined as a rate difference relative to the pooled rate in the 3 countries with the lowest NMRs (Norway, Sweden, and Finland; hereafter termed the top 3). The Kitagawa method was used to divide this excess into the proportion explained by the GA distribution of births and by GA-specific mortality rates. A sensitivity analysis was conducted among births 24 weeks' GA or greater. Results: There were 35 094 neonatal deaths among 15 123 428 live births for an overall NMR of 2.32 per 1000. The pooled NMR in the top 3 was 1.44 per 1000 (1937 of 1 342 528). Excess neonatal mortality compared with the top 3 ranged from 0.17 per 1000 in the Czech Republic to 1.82 per 1000 in Romania. Excess deaths were predominantly concentrated among births less than 28 weeks' GA (57.6% overall). Full-term births represented 22.7% of the excess deaths in Belgium, 17.8% in France, 40.6% in Romania and 17.3% in the United Kingdom. Heterogeneous patterns were observed when partitioning excess mortality into the proportion associated with the GA distribution vs GA-specific mortality. For example, these proportions were 9.2% and 90.8% in France, 58.4% and 41.6% in the United Kingdom, and 92.9% and 7.1% in Austria, respectively. These associations remained stable after removing births under 24 weeks' GA in most, but not all, countries. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of 14 European countries found wide NMR disparities with varying patterns by GA. This knowledge is important for developing effective strategies to reduce neonatal mortality.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeInfant MortalityCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLive BirthMale

Identifiers

PMID39110462
PMCPMC11307138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.