ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2024
A Faculty-Centered Career Consultation Service in an Academic Health Sciences Center: Five Years of Presenting Problems, Demographics, and Recommendations.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating Challenges for Psychologist Leaders in Academic Health Centers.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychologists in faculty affairs/faculty development (FAFD) roles can contribute to faculty vitality in academic health centers (AHCs) and mitigate barriers to advancement and retention. We describe a novel psychologist-led consultation service within an Office for Faculty Success (OFS) to support faculty across their career trajectories. We used 5 years of consultation data including faculty demographics, presenting concerns, and post-consultation evaluation data on consultation satisfaction and perceived benefits to examine trends and demographic group differences in consultation frequency, presenting concerns, and perceived benefits. From 2018 to 2023, 434 individuals presented for 683 consultations. Promotion in rank was the most frequent presenting concern. Women and racially/ethically minoritized faculty were found to present more frequently for repeat consultations, for concerns related to careers negotiation and advancement, and for intersectionality issues specific to gender and/or racial minority identities. From years one to five, there was a 93% increase in number of annual consultations performed and users were highly satisfied with the service (3.86/4). The consultation service is a unique, highly acceptable addition to interventions focused on career satisfaction and retention for AHC faculty, especially for women, early career, and minoritized faculty, and can serve as a model for other institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39110369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.