ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2024
Predicting Promoters in Multiple Prokaryotes with Prompt.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- StreptoCAD: An Open-Source Software Toolbox Automating Genome Engineering Workflows in Streptomycetes.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- iPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Promoters are important cis-regulatory elements for the regulation of gene expression, and their accurate predictions are crucial for elucidating the biological functions and potential mechanisms of genes. Many previous prokaryotic promoter prediction methods are encouraging in terms of the prediction performance, but most of them focus on the recognition of promoters in only one or a few bacterial species. Moreover, due to ignoring the promoter sequence motifs, the interpretability of predictions with existing methods is limited. In this work, we present a generalized method Prompt (Promoters in multiple prokaryotes) to predict promoters in 16 prokaryotes and improve the interpretability of prediction results. Prompt integrates three methods including RSK (Regression based on Selected k-mer), CL (Contrastive Learning) and MLP (Multilayer Perception), and employs a voting strategy to divide the datasets into high-confidence and low-confidence categories. Results on the promoter prediction tasks in 16 prokaryotes show that the accuracy (Accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient) of Prompt is greater than 80% in highly credible datasets of 16 prokaryotes, and is greater than 90% in 12 prokaryotes, and Prompt performs the best compared with other existing methods. Moreover, by identifying promoter sequence motifs, Prompt can improve the interpretability of the predictions. Prompt is freely available at https://github.com/duqimeng/PromptPrompt , and will contribute to the research of promoters in prokaryote.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39110340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.