Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110335›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2024

Outcome of whole brain irradiation with a dose-escalated simultaneous-integrated boost in patients with multiple large and/or diffuse brain metastases: real live data and review of the literature.

Linda Agolli, Luca Nicosia, Thomas Hilger, Gheorghe Iancu, Ann-Katrin Exeli, Bastian Eul, Tobias Struffert, Till Acker, Daniel Habermehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in treatment of patients with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linda Agolli *Department of Radiation Oncology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. linda.agolli@radiol.med.uni-giessen.de.
Luca Nicosia *Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Thomas HilgerMedical Physics, Radiation Oncology Radprax MVZ GMBH, Wuppertal, Germany.
Gheorghe IancuMedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, Giessen, Germany.
Ann-Katrin ExeliMedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, Giessen, Germany.
Bastian EulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, Giessen, Germany.
Tobias StruffertJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, NeuroradiologyGiessen, Germany.
Till AckerJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, NeurorpathologyGiessen, Germany.
Daniel HabermehlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe retrospectively investigate feasibility and safety of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) including a simultaneous-integrated boost technique (WBRT-SIB) in a cohort of patients with a very poor prognosis suffering from multiple and/or large brain metastases, unfavorable primary histology, poor performance status and/or symptomatic BMs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-five patients with high brain tumor burden, extracranial metastases and low life-expectancy were treated with WBRT-SIB mostly with 35-42 Gy/14 fractions. All metastases were boosted in patients with up to 12 BMs. In patients with > 12 BM, large and/or small metastases in critical brain regions were boosted up to a maximum of 12 SIB volumes.

resultsThe median number of BM was 8 (range 2-45) and the median BM diameter was 12 mm (range 4-90 mm). Fifteen (43%) patients had ≥ 10 BMs and 25 patients presented with a Karnofski index ≤ 80%. Primary tumor histology was NSCLC (n = 13), SCLC (n = 11), breast cancer (n = 7), melanoma (n = 2), other (n = 2). The median iPFS was not reached, and 12- and 18-months iPFS were 75% and 50%, respectively. Overall, seven patients had intracranial progression: two patients within the SIB and WBRT area, one patient only within the SIB region and four patients had new BMs in the WBRT volume alone. The median iPFS for non-SCLC patients was 17 months and the 12- and 18-month iPFS were 56.8% and 28.4%, respectively. There was no significant OS difference between SCLC-group and non-SCLC patients (p = 0.38). Overall, median OS was 8.7 months and 1-year OS was 25%. The treatment was generally well-tolerated with no observed cases of radionecrosis.

conclusionOur WBRT-SIB approach involves a combination of whole brain radiotherapy and a simultaneous integrated boost to specific tumor volumes, and its effectiveness is compared with other treatment modalities in the literature. Further research, including prospective studies with larger patient cohorts, is necessary to validate and refine the findings.

Identifiers

PMID39110335
PMCPMC11306485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.