ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Analysis of ventricular-vascular properties during preeclampsia: an echocardiography study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study is to analyze ventricular-vascular properties with different ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) ratio in the preeclamptic women. Seventy-seven pregnant women with preeclampsia and eighty-nine with normal pregnancy were performed echocardiography. VAC was defined as the ratio between aortic elastance (Ea) and left ventricular (LV) end-systolic elastance (Ees). Using the VAC value of 0.8 as the cut-off near uncoupling, the preeclampsia cases were divided into two subgroups: VAC ratio ≥ 0.8 and <0.8. Cardiac structure and function, VAC properties, as well as four components of the LV pressure-strain loop, including global myocardial work index (GWI), constructive work (GCW), wasted work (GWW), and work efficiency (GWE) were determined. The preeclampsia with VAC ≥ 0.8 had an enlarger indexed ventricular volume and a thicker relative ventricular wall than the VAC < 0.8. The Ees significantly increased in the subgroup with VAC < 0.8 and decreased in the VAC ≥ 0.8, while the Ea increased in both of them. The preeclampsia with VAC ≥ 0.8 showed an obvious augmentation in GWI, GCW and GWE, along with a similar GWW compared to those with VAC < 0.8. There were variable relationships between the LV pressure-strain components and VAC properties. Thus, the preeclampsia with VAC ≥ 0.8 undergoes a more adverse remodeling and a greater impact on cardiac contractility. The increased stiffness of the heart and arterial system, and increased resistance of peripheral vessels net lead to the deteriorative ventricular efficiency with elevated myocardial oxygen consumption during a preeclampsia pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39110321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.