ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Quantification accuracy in photon-counting detector CT for coronary artery calcium score: a pilot study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of photon-counting detector computed tomography in cardiovascular imaging.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Application of the Novel Two-Compartmental Model to Quantify Coronary Artery Calcium: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ultra-high spatial resolution at photon-counting computed tomography: technical insights and sustainable applications in cardiothoracic imaging.European radiology experimental · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To validate the accuracy of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT under various scanning settings and explore the optimized scanning settings considering both the accuracy and the radiation dose. A CACS phantom containing six hollow cylindrical hydroxyapatite calcifications of two sizes with three densities and 12 patients underwent CACS scans. For PCD-CT, two scanning modes (sequence and flash [high-pitch spiral mode]) and five tube voltages (90kV, 120kV, 140kV, Sn100kV, and Sn140kV) at different image quality (IQ) levels were set for phantom, and patients were scanned with 120kV at IQ19 using flash mode. All acquisitions from PCD-CT were reconstructed at 70keV. Acquisitions in sequence mode at 120kV on an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) was used as the reference. Agatston, mass, and volume scores were calculated. The CACS from PCD-CT exhibited excellent agreements with the reference (all intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.99). The root mean square error (RMSE) between the Agatston score acquired from PCD-CT and the reference (5.4-11.5) was small. A radiation dose reduction (16-75%) from PCD-CT compared with the reference was obtained in all protocols using flash mode, albeit with IQ20 only at sequence mode (22-44%). For the patients, ICC ( all ICC > 0.98) and Bland-Altman analysis of CACS all showed high agreements between PCD-CT and the reference, without reclassifying CACS categories(P = 0.317). PCD-CT yields repeatable and accurate CACS across diverse scanning protocols according to our pilot study. Sn100kV, 90kV, and 120kV using flash mode at IQ20 are recommended for clinical applications considering both accuracy and radiation dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39110320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.