Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110290›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2024

Metamaterial design for aortic aneurysm simulation using 3D printing.

Arthur K F Sakai, Ismar N Cestari, Eraldo de Sales, Marcelo Mazzetto, Idágene A Cestari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arthur K F SakaiElectrical Engineering Graduate Program, Telecommunications and Control Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ismar N CestariLaboratório de Bioengenharia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eraldo de SalesLaboratório de Bioengenharia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo MazzettoLaboratório de Bioengenharia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Idágene A CestariElectrical Engineering Graduate Program, Telecommunications and Control Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. idagene.cestari@incor.usp.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 130512/2021-4Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos 01 14 0177 00Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos 01 17 0054 00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/50889-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of three-dimensional (3D) printed anatomic models is steadily increasing in research and as a tool for clinical decision-making. The mechanical properties of polymers and metamaterials were investigated to evaluate their application in mimicking the biomechanics of the aortic vessel wall. METHODOLOGY: Uniaxial tensile tests were performed to determine the elastic modulus, mechanical stress, and strain of 3D printed samples. We used a combination of materials, designed to mimic biological tissues' properties, the rigid Vero

resultsUniaxial tensile tests showed that the use of a lattice-reinforcement increased rigidity and may increase the maximum stress generated. The pattern and material of the lattice-reinforcement may increase or reduce the strain at maximum stress, which is also affected by the base material used. Printed samples showed max stress ranging from 0.39 ± 0.01 MPa to 0.88 ± 0.02 MPa, and strain at max stress ranging from 70.44 ± 0.86% to 158.21 ± 8.99%. An example of an application was created by inserting a metamaterial designed as a lattice-reinforcement on a model of the aorta to simulate an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

conclusionThe maximum stresses obtained with the printed models were similar to those of aortic tissue reported in the literature, despite the fact that the models did not perfectly reproduce the biological tissue behavior.

Indexed as

3D printingAortic aneurysmBiomechanicsMetamaterials

Identifiers

PMID39110290
PMCPMC11304610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.