ReviewWorld journal of urology2024
Consensus statement addressing controversies and guidelines on pediatric urolithiasis.
Review in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Role of pediatric ureteroscopy for large renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis from EAU endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Global, regional, and national burden of urolithiasis among children and adolescents, 1990-2021, with forecasts to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive survey on urological stent practices by the European Association of Urology (EAU) Endourology.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Feasibility of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in pediatric ureteroscopy: A systematic review from the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology.Asian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Pediatric urolithiasis: expanding knowledge and refining minimally invasive management-editorial for the world journal of urology topic collection.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Pediatric ureteral stenting: state-of-the-art review.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards urinary calculi among patients: a cross-sectional study in Jiangsu Province, China.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Urolithiasis in Children-Clinical Picture, Pathogenesis, and Diagnostic Approach.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Imaging during pediatric stone management and follow up.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- Evaluating shear wave elastography as a predictor of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in children.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Awareness, use, and perceived barriers to artificial intelligence in pediatric urology: a multicenter survey.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
- Potassium citrate for stone prevention - Quantifying benefit through the number needed to treat: A narrative review.Urology annalsReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to investigate controversial pediatric urolithiasis issues systematically, integrating expert consensus and comprehensive guidelines reviews.
methodsTwo semi-structured online focus group meetings were conducted to discuss the study's need and content, review current literature, and prepare the initial survey. Data were collected through surveys and focus group discussions. Existing guidelines were reviewed, and a second survey was conducted using the Delphi method to validate findings and facilitate consensus. The primary outcome measures investigated controversial issues, integrating expert consensus and guideline reviews.
resultsExperts from 15 countries participated, including 20 with 16+ years of experience, 2 with 11-15 years, and 4 with 6-10 years. The initial survey identified nine main themes, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols and tailored treatments. Inter-rater reliability was high, with controversies in treatment approaches (score 4.6, 92% agreement), follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement), and diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement). The second survey underscored the critical need for consensus on identification, diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement), and standardized follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement).
conclusionThe importance of personalized treatment in pediatric urolithiasis is clear. Prioritizing low-radiation diagnostic tools, effectively managing residual stone fragments, and standardized follow-up protocols are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Integrating new technologies while ensuring safety and reliability is also essential. Harmonizing guidelines across regions can provide consistent and effective management. Future efforts should focus on collaborative research, specialized training, and the integration of new technologies in treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.