SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Early EEG and NIRS measurements in preterm babies: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preterm birth represents a public health problem, with prematurity being the leading cause of infant mortality. An objective brain maturation and oxygenation measurement are necessary. The objective has been To test the feasibility of EEG and NIRS combination in the assessment of physiological brain maturation and oxygenation in preterm and non-preterm babies. A systematic review in Pubmed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Dialnet, CINAHL, Scopus, Lilacs and PEDro databases until December 2022 was developed. 598 registers were found, finally 5 of them reached the inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers analyzed data and a third reviewer were available for discrepancies. All articles combined EEG and NIRS to assess brain oxygenation and maturation in healthy new-born babies. There is an agreement on the electrode's placement for EEG at P3 and P4; besides, these regions have been shown to be a development predictive area, as well as the frontoparietal region for the NIRS region and comparison between regions. There is little evidence about the physiological brain electrical activity and oxygenation without stimuli.Conclusion: EEG and NIRS have been useful to assess brain electrical activity and oxygenation in preterm and non-preterm. The combined measurement of these instruments could be essential in neurological disorders diagnosis or their sequels. Unfortunately, the heterogeneity of the results found prevents a consensus on which variables are the most appropriate for the assessment of this population. What is Known • Brain assessment could help clinicians to prevent sequels. • There is an agreement for EEG electrodes placement at P3 and P4 region. What is New • EEG and NIRS assessment are effective measurements for preterm babies. • P3 and P4 regions have shown to be a predictive area of development, as well as the frontoparietal region for NIRS assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.