ArticleArchives of microbiology2024
Effective RNA isolation method for gram-positive and acid-fast bacteria: metamorphosed from conventional RNA isolation techniques.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell Disruption and RNA Extraction fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The RNA-based study provides an excellent indication of an organism's gene expression profile. Obtaining high-yield and high-purity RNA from Gram-positive and acid-fast bacteria is difficult without high-end kits and facilities. We optimised effective and simple protocol for RNA isolation that is a combination of enzymatic, physical and chemical treatment to disrupt cells. We successfully isolated high quality intact total RNA with yields ranging from 23.13 ± 0.40 to 61.51 ± 0.27 µg and the 260/280 purity ratio of 1.95 ± 0.01 to 2.05 ± 0.01 from Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Mycobacterium smegmatis. These results represents a significantly enhanced yield and purity compared to other combination of techniques which we performed. Compared to previous studies the yield obtained by this method is high for the studied organisms. Furthermore the yielded RNA was successfully used for downstream applications such as quantitative real time PCR. The described method can be easily optimised and used for various bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39110213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.