Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2024
A Modified McCall Culdoplasty in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Anatomical and Functional Outcomes.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to evaluate anatomical and functional outcomes of a modified McCall culdoplasty compared with the traditional technique for pelvic organ prolapse.
methodsThis prospective clinical observational study was conducted in a secondary referral urogynecological center between October 2021 and October 2022. A modified McCall culdoplasty was performed in 85 patients (group A). It was characterized by dissection of uterosacral ligaments up to the ischial spines, their shortening and attachment to the vaginal apex and both the rectovaginal and the vesicovaginal fascia. Outcomes were compared with those of a group of 86 patients (group B) who underwent the traditional culdoplasty between September 2020 and September 2021. Primary outcome was prolapse recurrence. Secondary endpoints included subjective outcomes, vaginal length, quality of life, and urinary and anal incontinence. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and Student's t tests.
resultsAt 12 months, prolapse recurrence occurred in 2.5% (CI 0.7-8.8%) of patients in group A and in 6.7% (CI 2.9-14.7%) in group B. Postoperative vaginal length was 8.3 ± 0.78 cm in group A and 6.4 ± 1.1 cm in group B (p < 0.001). The Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire revealed that 76 patients (96.2%) in group A versus 64 (85%) in group B were very satisfied (p < 0.03). Both groups showed an improvement in urinary symptoms and quality of life.
conclusionsThe modified McCall culdoplasty showed successful anatomical and functional outcomes, with a tendency towards lower recurrence rates than the traditional McCall procedure. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm our data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39110177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.