ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
Mesothelioma: molecular pathology and biomarkers.
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse mesotheliomas are characterized by recurrent genomic alterations involving tumor suppressors and epigenetic regulators such as BAP1, CDKN2A, MTAP, and NF2. Depending on the differential diagnosis as informed by histologic assessment, one can apply the appropriate immunohistochemical and/or molecular panels to reach the correct pathologic diagnosis, sometimes even in cases with limited tissues. Biomarkers aid in the diagnosis of mesothelioma in the following scenarios: 1) For a tumor that is overtly malignant, how can one distinguish mesothelioma from other tumors? 2) For a mesothelial proliferation, how can one distinguish mesothelioma from a reactive process? To distinguish mesotheliomas from carcinomas, at least two positive and two negative markers are currently recommended. To distinguish sarcomatoid mesothelioma from pleomorphic carcinoma, even more markers-and sometimes molecular testing-are needed. To distinguish mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial conditions, useful immunohistochemical biomarkers include BAP1, MTAP, and merlin, which serve as surrogates for the corresponding gene mutation status. In patients with unusual clinical history, for tumors with a peculiar microscopic appearance, and/or in cases with an equivocal immunophenotypic profile, molecular testing can help to exclude mimics and to confirm the pathologic diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39110166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.