Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110161›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Role of proprioception in corrective visually-guided movements: larger movement errors in both arms of a deafferented individual compared to control participants.

Shanie A L Jayasinghe, Robert L Sainburg, Fabrice R Sarlegna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shanie A L JayasingheDivision of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. jayas045@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4618-5170
Robert L SainburgDepartment of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2627-1258
Fabrice R SarlegnaCNRS, Aix Marseille Univ, ISM, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-7286

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Predicting Ipsilesional Motor Deficits in Stroke with Dynamic Dominance ModelR01HD059783 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SAINBURG, ROBERT L, WINSTEIN, CAROLEE J · 2010 to 2023
$5.3M
J. Lloyd and Dorothy F. Huck endowment J. Lloyd and Dorothy F. Huck endowmentNational Center for Scientific Research-France PICS grantNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002494NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059783NIH HHS R01HD059783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proprioception plays an important role in both feedforward and feedback processes underlying movement control. This has been shown with individuals who suffered a profound proprioceptive loss and use vision to partially compensate for the sensory loss. The purpose of this study was to specifically examine the role of proprioception in feedback motor responses to visual perturbations by examining voluntary arm movements in an individual with a rare case of selective peripheral deafferentation (GL). We compared her left and right hand movements with those of age-matched female control participants (70.0 years ± 0.2 SEM) during a reaching task. Participants were asked to move their unseen hand, represented by a cursor on the screen, quickly and accurately to reach a visual target. A visual perturbation could be pseudorandomly applied, at movement onset, to either the target position (target jump) or the cursor position (cursor jump). Results showed that despite the continuous visual feedback that was provided, GL produced larger errors in final position accuracy compared to control participants, with her left nondominant hand being more erroneous after a cursor jump. We also found that the proprioceptively-deafferented individual produced less spatially efficient movements than the control group. Overall, these results provide evidence of a heavier reliance on proprioceptive feedback for movements of the nondominant hand relative to the dominant hand, supporting the view of a lateralization of the feedback processes underlying motor control.

Indexed as

MovementProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceAgedArmCase-Control StudiesFeedback, SensoryFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansVisual PerceptionCursor jumpLarge fiber sensory neuropathyProprioceptive feedbackSomatosensory lossTarget jumpVisual perturbation

Identifiers

PMID39110161
PMCPMC11905829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.