Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110121›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2024

Defective autophagy of pericytes enhances radiation-induced senescence promoting radiation brain injury.

Na Luo, Wenjun Zhu, Xiaoyu Li, Min Fu, Yuanyuan Zhang, Feng Yang, Yiling Zhang, Ziqi Chen, Qiang Zhang, Bi Peng and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Surgical management of pediatric pineal region tumors: an overview of current strategies.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Targeting gut microbiota and metabolites in cancer radiotherapy.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Na LuoDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wenjun ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoyu LiDepartment of Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Min FuDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuanyuan Zhang
Feng YangDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yiling ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ziqi ChenDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qiang ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bi PengDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qianxia LiDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuanhui LiuDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Guangyuan HuDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaohong PengDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2991-313X

Funding

Beijing Xisike Oncology Research Foundation Y-2019AZMS-0390 and Y-tongshu2021/ms-0199Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2023AFB727National Natural Sciences Foundation of China 82303830, 82003312, and 82173311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation-induced brain injury (RBI) represents a major challenge for cancer patients undergoing cranial radiotherapy. However, the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of RBI remain inconclusive. With the continuous exploration of the mechanisms of RBI, an increasing number of studies have implicated cerebrovascular dysfunction as a key factor in RBI-related cognitive impairment. As pericytes are a component of the neurovascular unit, there is still a lack of understanding in current research about the specific role and function of pericytes in RBI.

methodsWe constructed a mouse model of RBI-associated cognitive dysfunction in vivo and an in vitro radiation-induced pericyte model to explore the effects of senescent pericytes on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and normal central nervous system cells, even glioma cells. To further clarify the effects of pericyte autophagy on senescence, molecular mechanisms were explored at the animal and cellular levels. Finally, we validated the clearance of pericyte senescence by using a senolytic drug and all-trans retinoic acid to investigate the role of radiation-induced pericyte senescence.

resultsOur findings indicated that radiation-induced pericyte senescence plays a key role in BBB dysfunction, leading to RBI and subsequent cognitive decline. Strikingly, pericyte senescence also contributed to the growth and invasion of glioma cells. We further demonstrated that defective autophagy in pericytes is a vital regulatory mechanism for pericyte senescence. Moreover, autophagy activated by rapamycin could reverse pericyte senescence. Notably, the elimination of senescent cells by senolytic drugs significantly mitigated radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction.

conclusionsOur results demonstrated that pericyte senescence may be a promising therapeutic target for RBI and glioma progression.

Indexed as

AutophagyBlood-Brain BarrierCellular SenescencePericytesAnimalsBrain InjuriesBrain NeoplasmsCognitive DysfunctionGliomaHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRadiation InjuriesRadiation Injuries, Experimentalautophagycellular senescencepericyteradiation-induced brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39110121
PMCPMC11630511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.