Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110010›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Cost-effectiveness analysis and return on investment of SunSmart Western Australia to prevent skin cancer.

Louisa G Collins, Carolyn Minto, Melissa Ledger, Sally Blane, Delia Hendrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louisa G CollinsPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, 300 Herston Rd, Herston QLD 4006, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-4249
Carolyn MintoCancer Council Western Australia, Perth, Level 1, 420 Bagot Rd, Subiaco WA 6008, Western Australia, Australia.
Melissa LedgerCancer Council Western Australia, Perth, Level 1, 420 Bagot Rd, Subiaco WA 6008, Western Australia, Australia.
Sally BlaneCancer Council Western Australia, Perth, Level 1, 420 Bagot Rd, Subiaco WA 6008, Western Australia, Australia.
Delia HendrieCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Kent St, Bentley WA 6102, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

Cancer Council Western AustraliaWestern Australian Department of HealthWestern Australian Health Promotion Foundation (Healthway)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year, malignant melanoma accounts for 57 000 deaths globally. If current rates continue, there will be an estimated 510 000 new cases annually and 96 000 deaths by 2040. Melanoma and keratinocyte cancers (KCs) incur a large societal burden. Using a mathematical population model, we performed an economic evaluation of the SunSmart program in the state of Western Australia (WA), a primary prevention program to reduce the incidence of skin cancer, versus no program. A societal perspective was taken combining costs to the health system, patients and lost productivity. The model combined data from pragmatic trial evidence of sun protection, epidemiological studies and national cost reports. The main outcomes modelled were societal and government costs, skin cancer counts, melanoma deaths, life years and quality-adjusted life years. Over the next 20 years, the model predicted that implementing the WA SunSmart program would prevent 13 728 KCs, 636 melanomas and 46 melanoma deaths per 100 000 population. Furthermore, 251 life years would be saved, 358 quality-adjusted life years gained and AU$2.95 million in cost savings to society per 100 000 population would be achieved. Key drivers of the model were the rate reduction of benign lesions from sunscreen use, the costs of purchasing sunscreen and the effectiveness of reducing KCs in sunscreen users. The likelihood of WA SunSmart being cost-effective was 90.1%. For the WA Government, the estimated return on investment was $8.70 gained for every $1 invested. Primary prevention of skin cancer is a cost-effective strategy for preventing skin cancers.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisMelanomaQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSkin NeoplasmsSunscreening AgentsAdultAgedCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionWestern AustraliaSunscreening Agentscost-effectivenesseconomic evaluationkeratinocyte carcinomasmelanomaprimary preventionskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID39110010
PMCPMC11333957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.