Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39110009›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada).

Stephanie Radziszewski, Janie Houle, Corentin Montiel, Jean-Marc Fontan, Juan Torres, Kate Frolich, Antoine Boivin, Simon Coulombe, Hélène Gaudreau

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephanie RadziszewskiDepartment of Physical Education, Université Laval, 2300, rue de la Terrasse, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Janie HouleDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, 100, rue Sherbrooke Ouest, Montréal, Québec, H2X 3P2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-5076
Corentin MontielDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, 100, rue Sherbrooke Ouest, Montréal, Québec, H2X 3P2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-1443
Jean-Marc FontanDepartment of Sociology, Université du Québec à Montréal, 1255, St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 3R9, Canada.
Juan TorresSchool of Urban Planning, Université de Montréal, 2940, chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1B9, Canada.
Kate FrolichSchool of Public Health, Université de Montréal, 7101, avenue du Parc, Montréal, Québec, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Antoine BoivinFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 2900, boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Simon CoulombeDepartment of Industrial Relations, Université Laval, 1030, avenue des Sciences-Humaines, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Hélène GaudreauDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, 100, rue Sherbrooke Ouest, Montréal, Québec, H2X 3P2, Canada.

Funding

Audace Grant 2019-AUDC-263108Fondation de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal 1024006Fonds de Recherche du Québec
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intersectoral collaborations are recommended as effective strategies to reduce health inequalities. People most affected by health inequalities, as are people living in poverty, remain generally absent from such intersectoral collaborations. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects can be leveraged to better understand how to involve people with lived experience to support both individual and community empowerment. In this paper, we offer a critical reflection on a CBPR project conducted in public housing in Québec, Canada, that aimed to develop intersectoral collaboration between tenants and senior executives from four sectors (housing, health, city and community organizations). This single qualitative case study design consisted of fieldwork documents, observations and semi-structured interviews. Using the Emancipatory Power Framework (EPF) and the Limiting Power Framework (LPF), we describe examples of types of power and resistance shown by the tenants, the intersectoral partners and the research team. The discussion presents lessons learned through the study, including the importance for research teams to reflect on their own power, especially when aiming to reduce health inequalities. The paper concludes by describing the limitations of the analyses conducted through the EPF-LPF frameworks and suggestions to increase the transformative power of future studies.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchPublic HousingQualitative ResearchEmpowermentHealth Status DisparitiesHumansIntersectoral CollaborationInterviews as TopicPower, PsychologicalQuebeccommunity-based participatory researchhealth promotionintersectoral collaborationpowerpublic housing

Identifiers

PMID39110009
PMCPMC11304601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.