Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39109969›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Olfactory learning in

Dimitri Peftuloglu, Stefan Bonestroo, Roos Lenders, Hans M Smid, Marcel Dicke, Joop J A van Loon, Alexander Haverkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The lepidopteran analyst: how caterpillars, moths and butterflies encode taste identity and valence.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Olfactory learning inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dimitri Peftuloglu *Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-3286-2536
Stefan Bonestroo *Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708PB, The Netherlands.
Roos LendersLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708PB, The Netherlands.
Hans M SmidLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5867-2799
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8565-8896
Joop J A van LoonLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4260-0501
Alexander HaverkampLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen 6708PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-9659

Funding

Aard- en Levenswetenschappen, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Butterflies, like many insects, use gustatory and olfactory cues innately to assess the suitability of an oviposition site and are able to associate colours and leaf shapes with an oviposition reward. Studies on other insects have demonstrated that the quality of the reward is a crucial factor in forming associative memory. We set out to investigate whether the large cabbage white

Indexed as

ButterfliesCuesLearningOvipositionAnimalsFemaleGlucosinolatesOdorantsSmellGlucosinolatessinigringlucosinolateslepidopteraolfactory conditioningoviposition stimulusPieris brassicae

Identifiers

PMID39109969
PMCPMC11305133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.