Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39109896›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

The functions of leg muscles, structures and mechanisms in running.

James R Usherwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James R UsherwoodStructure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College , Hatfield, North Mymms AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8794-4677

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 202854/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The actions of the major human leg muscles are well established; however, the functions of these muscle actions during steady running remain unclear. Here, leg structures and mechanisms are considered in terms of their functions in meeting the task of a vehicle acting as an effective machine, supporting body weight during translation with low mechanical work demand and in supplying mechanical work economically. Legs are modelled as a sequence of linkages that predict muscle actions and reveal the varying muscle functions within the integrated leg. Work avoidance is achieved with isometric muscles and linkages that promote a sliding of the hip over the ground contact, resulting in an approximately horizontal path of the centre of mass. Economical work supply requires, for muscle with constrained power, shortening over the entire stance duration; this function is achieved by the hamstrings without disrupting the linkages resulting in work avoidance. In late stance, the two functions occur through coactivation of antagonistic muscles, providing one answer to Lombard's paradox. Quadriceps and hamstring tensions result in opposing moments about both hip and knee joints, but by doing so perform the independent yet complementary roles of work avoidance during translating weight support and economical work supply.

Indexed as

LegMuscle, SkeletalRunningBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansgaitlinkageLombard’s paradoxmusclerun

Identifiers

PMID39109896
PMCPMC11305130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.