Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39109349›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Zoonosis screening in Spanish immunocompromised children and their pets.

Paula Garcia-Sanchez, David Romero-Trancón, Iker Falces-Romero, Paula Navarro Carrera, Guillermo Ruiz-Carrascoso, David Carmena, María Casares Jiménez, Antonio Rivero-Juárez, Laura Moya, Jaume Rodón and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exposure of Wild Ruminants toVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Targeted-Amplicon NGS forVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Paula Garcia-SanchezPediatric Emergency Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
David Romero-TrancónHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Iker Falces-RomeroClinical Microbiology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Paula Navarro CarreraClinical Microbiology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo Ruiz-CarrascosoClinical Microbiology Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
David CarmenaCenter for Biomedical Research in Infectious Diseases Network (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.
María Casares JiménezCenter for Biomedical Research in Infectious Diseases Network (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Rivero-JuárezCenter for Biomedical Research in Infectious Diseases Network (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Laura MoyaIdexx Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume RodónIdexx Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain.
Fernando EsperónVeterinary Faculty, European University of Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Belén Pérez-HernandoCenter for Biomedical Research in Infectious Diseases Network (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío Sánchez-LeónHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Jara Hurtado-GallegoHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Sonia AlcoleaHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Talía SainzHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Cristina CalvoHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Ana Méndez-EchevarríaHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although pets provide several social-emotional benefits for children, the risk of zoonosis must be considered among immunocompromised individuals. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital including immunocompromised patients younger than 20 years owning dogs and/or cats. Colonization and/or infection was evaluated by stool studies, bacterial swabs, blood polymerase chain reaction and serological studies in both patients and their pets, to evaluate potential zoonotic transmission occurrence. Results: We included 74 patients and their 92 pets (63 dogs, 29 cats). Up to 44.6% of the patients and 31.5% of the pets had at least 1 positive result. Up to 18.4% of pets' fecal samples were positive (bacteria, parasites or hepatitis E virus). No helminths were observed despite the high frequency of incorrect intestinal deworming practices. Among children, gastrointestinal microorganisms were found in 37.3% (primarily Conclusion: Exposure to zoonotic agents was detected in both patients and pets; however, shared colonization events were almost nonexistent. In our cohort, dogs and cats do not appear to entail high zoonosis transmission risk for immunocompromised patients.

Indexed as

childrencolonizationemerging pathogensimmunocompromisedinfectionpetszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID39109349
PMCPMC11300328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.