Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39109343›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Real-world diagnostic potential of bacterial biomarkers of canine periodontitis.

C V Wallis, M Soltero-Rivera, C Harvey, R M Reynolds, L J Carvell-Miller, A Colyer, T S McKee, T Mills, P J Bergman, P Watson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

C V WallisWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
M Soltero-RiveraDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
C HarveyColin Harvey LLC, Cherry Hill, NJ, United States.
R M ReynoldsWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
L J Carvell-MillerWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
A ColyerWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
T S McKeeVCA Clinical Studies, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
T MillsVCA Clinical Studies, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
P J BergmanVCA Clinical Studies, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
P WatsonWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
L J HolcombeWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of bacterial biomarkers by comparing the performance of molecular detection assays with clinical assessments of dog's oral health performed by veterinarians. Methods: Supragingival and subgingival plaque samples were collected from 127 client-owned dogs, pre-booked for procedures under general anesthesia, visiting veterinary practices in the United States. DNA was extracted and bacterial biomarkers quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Gingivitis and periodontitis were recorded by a trained clinician using the Weighted Gingivitis Periodontitis Score which involved assessing the buccal surfaces of 18 teeth while under general anesthesia. Intraoral dental radiographs of the left and right mandibular first molar teeth were also obtained. These data were then used to establish the diagnostic performance of the molecular assay to detect periodontitis. Results: An initial conscious, visual oral examination performed by the veterinarian identified 67.7% of dogs as having periodontitis, but examination under general anesthesia indicated a higher proportion (86.6%). Analysis of supragingival plaque samples collected by veterinarians from conscious and unconscious dogs demonstrated the assay had an accuracy of 77.7 to 80.9%, a sensitivity of 77.6 to 81.0%, and a specificity of 80.0%. Discussion: Use of this molecular screening tool in conscious dogs has the potential to improve early periodontal disease detection and support veterinary decision making, ultimately improving the oral health of dogs and consequently their quality of life.

Indexed as

detectiondiagnosticdogmicrobiotaperiodontal disease

Identifiers

PMID39109343
PMCPMC11301947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.